Select Page

The SUBROUTINE for Input – 5 – Needs

My comments on making suggestions in order to find deeper Problems apply equally well to Needs. Asking “What are your needs” is not going to work – I have to work a lot harder than that! When doing so, I find the Implication questions described in the SPIN method to...

The SUBROUTINE for Input – 7 – The Dreaded Short Circuit Revisited

The dreaded Short Circuit invariably starts from the first step of this mode of the SUBROUTINE, and so let’s just go back to it for a moment. The mistake I have to avoid is pushing Solutions – “Let’s try this …”, “We could do that …”, and so on, based on a superficial...

The SUBROUTINE for Input – 9 – Resistence due to a Short-Circuit

For example: My client complains that the 16-bit processor in his satellite application is too slow. Seeing an opportunity, I leap into action ….“Our HiRel 32-bit processor would seem to be ideal …” Yes, but I have got to think of software compatibility … Yes, but the...

The SUBROUTINE for Input – 1 – Overview

But first, let’s remind ourselve of how the basic steps are interpreted in this mode. I first ask about the Situation, looking for observations that are free of judgements, interpretations and generalisations. I move on to finding out about the Problems that the...

The SUBROUTINE for Input – 6 – Solutions

The first thing to look out for when listening to the client’s Solutions is the Short Circuit. For example, I could arrive at this step because the client says, ‘… the software is crashing all the time and I need a new build today!’ … … pushing the conversation into a...